Under test the STD1LNK60Z and STQ1NK60ZR produced different thermal behavior because of the different package Rth values:

RthJA in IPAK was 100°C/W, while the

RthJA in TO-92 was 120°C/W
The system conduction loss was less significant than its switching losses, so the STQ1NK60ZR and STQ2NK60ZR temperatures were similar.
The better switching performance of STQ1NK60ZR, offsets the advantage of the lower RDS(on) value of STQ2NK60ZR. The best choice therefore, appears to be the STD1LNK60Z for reliability, and the STQ1NK60ZR for better cost and higher voltage (700V and 800V, for better BVDSS derating).